• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Trenam

People First. Lawyers Second.

The Trenam Code
of Client Commitment
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Our Team
  • Your Needs
  • What We Do
  • About Us
  • News & Insights
  • Code of Commitment
  • Careers
  • Contact Us

News & Insights

Jacqueline Prats Discusses Supreme Court Ruling on Class Action Waivers in FSR Magazine

Jacqueline Prats Discusses Supreme Court Ruling on Class Action Waivers in FSR Magazine

06/12/2018 by Trenam News and Jacqueline Prats

In an article for Full Service Restaurant Magazine published on June 11, 2018, Jacqueline Prats provides insight on last month’s Supreme Court ruling on class action waivers in employee arbitration agreements. The Court’s ruling held that class action waivers are enforceable and employers can prohibit their employees from pursuing class action lawsuits for workplace claims. The decision, which is hailed as a win for employers, could alter employment contracts in the restaurant industry and beyond.

For restaurant employers, wage-and-hour law violations are some of the costliest class action suits they could face as plaintiffs can recover double their unpaid wages plus their attorneys’ fees under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). In class actions, the damages add up rapidly since plaintiffs join together to share these costs. Consequently, employers began to require employees to sign agreements promising not to take on class action lawsuits against their employer, which is usually carried out by inserting a mandatory arbitration agreement into their employee contract.

Over the last several years, plaintiffs pursuing class actions against their employer argued that the waivers were unenforceable because they violated Sections 7 and 8 of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). By the end of last year, there was a split between several Federal Circuit Courts of Appeal on whether the waivers were enforceable. In May 2018, the Supreme Court resolved this split and held that class action waivers are in fact enforceable by employers.

There are multiple key takeaways for employers from the Court’s ruling. First, arbitration can be just as complicated as litigation, involve fees for arbitrators and arbitration associations, and could cause employers to be faced with high administrative fees multiple times for each individual plaintiff. In addition, the ongoing #MeToo and #TimesUp movements have been highly critical of forced arbitration, so requiring employees to sign arbitration agreements with class action waivers could have major public relations consequences.

Please click here to view the full article.

Filed Under: Employment, News

About Trenam News

About Jacqueline Prats

Primary Sidebar

CONTACT

Lori Rabinowitz
Chief Marketing & Business Development Officer
P: 813-227-7495

News & Insights

  • Events
  • News
  • Publications

News by Practice

  • Antitrust and Trade Regulation
  • Appellate
  • Bankruptcy & Creditors’ Rights
  • Business Transactions
  • Casualty / Personal Injury Defense
  • Construction
  • Cybersecurity and Data Privacy
  • Eminent Domain and Property Rights Litigation
  • Employment
  • Environmental
  • Estate and Trust Planning
  • Expert Witness
  • Financial Services
  • Government Contracting
  • Health Care
  • Hospitality
  • Intellectual Property
  • Land Use and Government
  • Litigation and Dispute Resolution
  • Marital and Family
  • Mediation and Arbitration
  • Personal Injury
  • Professional Liability
  • Qui Tam / Whistle Blower Claims
  • Real Estate and Lending Transactions
  • SBA Lending
  • Securities
  • Securities Litigation and Arbitration
  • Tax
  • Technology Company Transactions

Footer

© 2021 Trenam

  • Privacy & Legal
  • Site Map
  • Client Portal